N° 11 - June 2004


Modern Medical Examination Methods in Ferrochromium
and Stainless Steel Production

prepared by Dr. Markku Huvinen, M.D., Ph.D.,
Chief Medical Officer, Outokumpu Oyj, Finland.


Summary

  Occupational exposure to chromium compounds has been reported in various industries including chromium chemicals and metallurgical production. Speciation of chromium is essential in exposure assessment. It has been under discussion whether there is a threshold level for hexavalent chromium exposure, especially in relation to genotoxic effects. Technological innovations in metallurgical industry have reduced the chromium exposure levels during the last decades. Ideal medical examination methods for surveillance for occupational health effects should be non-invasive and non-radiative. They should also give early warning signals.
Magneto-pneumography provides a non-invasive method for studying lung retention and the clearance of dust among subjects exposed to industrial aerosols with a magnetic component. Micronucleus assay of exfoliated cells of nasal mucosa is a method to study genotoxic effects of various exposures. These modern methods, in addition to the conventional ones, have been used in a research program in the Finnish ferrochromium and stainless steel production chain. The results indicated that an average exposure time of 23 years in ferrochromium and stainless steel production and exposure to dusts containing low concentrations of Cr6+ or Cr3+ does not lead to any respiratory changes detectable by lung function tests or radiography nor to any increase in symptoms of respiratory diseases. Nor does this exposure lead to nasal changes detectable by clinical or cytological examination. No genotoxic effects attributable to occupational chromium exposure could be observed in the micronucleus analysis of exfoliated nasal cells.

Introduction

Occupational exposure to chromium
Exposure to chromium can occur in the production and use of chromates and dichromates in the chemical industry, in the stainless steel industry, in the production and use of alloys, in refractory work, in the chromium-plating industry, in leather tanning, in the production and use of wood preservatives, in cement manufacture and use, and in the welding of stainless steel.

There are several studies on chromium exposure in ferrochromium production. In a Norwegian ferrochromium plant the mean level of total chromium ranged from 10 to 290 µg/m3, about 11% - 13% of which was water-soluble [1]. Among Swedish ferrochromium workers the exposure to Cr6+ was estimated to be 250 µg/m3 during arc furnace operations and 10 - 50 µg/m3 during transport, metal grinding, maintenance and sample preparation. The total concentration of metallic chromium and Cr3+ at the worksites was 500 - 2500 µg/m3 [2]. In an Italian ferrochromium plant the dust samples
contained 0.9% - 3.8% chromium and the airborne levels of total chromium were 20 - 158 µg/m3. The concentration of Cr6+ was below 1 µg/m3 [3]. In a Finnish ferrochromium smelter the exposure to total chromium was reported to be 200 µg/m3 during ferrochromium smelting [4].

The quantitative data on chromium exposure in the production of stainless steel are limited. In a French stainless steel plant the concentrations of total chromium ranged from 15 to 300 µg/m3 [5]. In a Finnish stainless steel plant the fumes and dusts contained 1.5% - 5% chromium during stainless steel melting, 0.2% - 0.3% during continuous casting and 1.6% - 13% during the grinding of stainless steel. The mean Cr6+ concentration was 1.5 µg/m3 [6].

The chemical solubility of metal particles present in workplace air may vary substantially at different stages of production, which indicates that the metals are chemically bound in different ways. The particle structure of metallurgical fumes and dusts will depend largely on temperature, process conditions like oxidation and reduction, slag compounds, other metals present and mechanical handling. The speciation of metal compounds is very important in order to understand their biological effects.

Respiratory health effects of chromium
Ulcerations and perforations of the nasal septum among chromate workers were described as early as 1869 [7]. Nasal chrome ulcers and perforations have been observed among ferrochromium production workers, too [8].

Obstructive effects on lung function have been reported in several studies. Reduced forced vital capacity (FVC) and an increased prevalence of obstructive lung diseases were found among electro-furnace workers in a ferrochromium plant. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) chromate production, chromate pigment manufacture and chrome plating are causally associated with an increased risk of lung cancer [9].

The carcinogenicity of Cr6+ may be mediated through genotoxic mechanisms. Cr6+ has been shown to be genotoxic in various short-term tests [10]. Although there are also clearly negative studies on these end points, many studies have reported elevated frequencies of chromosome aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges or micronuclei in peripheral lymphocytes of chromium electroplating workers or in other workers exposed to Cr6+ compounds [11-17].

Studies on the frequency of micro-nucleated exfoliated nasal epithelial cells have suggested that the reductive capacity of the mucosa and reduction and trapping of Cr3+ and reactive oxygen species inside the target cells probably adequately protect the cells from the genotoxic effects of Cr6+. These defence mechanisms may be overcome only at high exposures, so that a threshold has been proposed for Cr6+ carcinogenicity [18,19].

Medical Examination Methods in Metallurgical Industry

Ideal medical examination methods for surveillance of occupational health effects should be non-invasive and non-radiative. They should also give early warning signals.

Classical methods include lung function tests (spirometry, measurement of diffusing capacity), radiological examinations and biological monitoring. Examples of the more recent methods are magneto-pneumography and micronucleus assay of exfoliated epithelial cells.

Magneto-pneumography (MPG) provides a non-invasive method for studying lung retention and the clearance of dust among subjects exposed to industrial aerosols with a magnetic component. MPG measures the remanent magnetic field (RMF) and the relaxation rate (ReR) of lung burden particles after a short magnetization pulse.

The minimum detectable average magnetic field is about 10 pT. The sensitivity corresponds to a magnetic moment of 1.5 µAm2 and about 0.5 mg of magnetite. The reproducibility of the measurement results is 5%.

Micronuclei are small additional nuclei seen in the cytoplasm of a cell. These micronuclei are formed of total chromosomes or particles of chromosomes that are left over after cell division. In micronucleus assay it is possible to identify exposures causing either structural or numerical chromosome aberrations.

Finnish Research Programme

The integrated stainless steel production chain in Finland is unique; the chromite mine and all the ferrochromium and stainless steel production plants are in the same region. (Figure 1)


Figure 1. From Chrome Ore to Stainless Steel

The research programme on long-term respiratory health effects was carried out in 1987 - 2002. There were six individual studies, which have been published in peer-reviewed journals. The cross-sectional clinical pulmonary studies were conducted in 1993 and 1998.

The purpose of the research programme was to assess the exposure levels of different chromium species throughout the consecutive stages of stainless steel production and to study possible health effects and, if health effects are detected, to examine the causal relationship between specific exposure and the health effects. There were approximately 300 workers in the follow-up study of respiratory health. Their average exposure time was 23 years in the same production department.

Exposure to dust and chromium compounds was assessed from personal and stationary samples. Chromium concentrations were measured in urine and blood. The surface structure and the chemical composition of the metal particles encountered in the workplace air were examined by electron microscopic methods. Magneto-pneumography was used to study the retention of dust in the lungs. Nasal health effects were studied by clinical examination, endoscopy, cytology and an assessment of the frequency of micronucleated exfoliated cells of the nasal mucosa. Respiratory symptoms and diseases were studied with the aid of a questionnaire, lung function testing, measurements of diffusing capacity and radiographic examinations.

Results of the Research Programme

Exposure to chromium was observed in all the departments studied. Exposure to hexavalent chromium was low; at the chromite mine no hexavalent chromium was detected. The observed levels of chromium in the urine and blood were, on average, higher than the levels among persons with no occupational exposure to chromium.
Magneto-pneumography showed a low accumulation of dust in the lungs. There were no significant differences in nasal symptoms, diseases, cytology or the frequency of micro-nucleated cells between the exposed groups. In the first cross-sectional study no significant differences in the odds ratios of the respiratory symptoms were found
between the exposed and control groups. The smokers in the chromite group had significantly lower forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second and diffusing capacity. In the follow-up study no adverse effects were observed in the group exposed to hexavalent chromium, either in comparison with the control group in the cross-sectional study or during the 5-year follow-up. (Tables 1 and 2) [20].

Table 1. Lung function measurements as percentage of predicted values (smokers*)
Cr6+ group Cr3+ group Chromite group Control group
Lung 1993 1998 1993 1998 1993 1998 1993 1998
function (n=63) (n=63) (n=47) (n=47) (n=26) (n=26) (n=52) (n=52)
variable Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
FVC 93.5 (9.6) 89.6 (11.5) 90.7 (9.6) 90.3 (10.6) 87.8 (10.9) 87.2 (10.3) 94.9 (10.8) 92.9 (11.5)
FEV1 91.8 (12.5) 87.9 (14.1) 89.1 (10.7) 87.6 (12.2) 85.1 (13.0) 83.0 (12.4) 92.6 (12.3) 88.5 (13.6)
FEV% 98.2 (8.0) 97.8 (7.8) 98.0 (7.1) 97.1 (7.8) 94.4 (8.1) 95.2 (8.4) 97.4 (7.2) 95.2 (8.7)
TLCO 98.5 (16.6) 109.0 (17.5) 92.4 (12.8) 102.9 (14.9) 93.1 (13.9) 100.3 (15.7) 94.9 (13.1) 102.1 (11.8)
TLCOHb 97.5 (15.5) 103.8 (16.6) 92.5 (12.6) 96.2 (14.6) 92.9 (13.7) 92.9 (16.3) 94.6 (13.6) 95.9 (11.8)
TLCO/VA 104.9 (16.56) 92.1 (13.0) 98.9 (15.9) 87.3 (14.1) 103.8 (15.9) 90.0 (16.4) 99.9 (14.6) 86.3 (10.8)
TLCO/VAHb 104.7 (16.4) 101.9 (14.4) 99.2 (15.9) 94.8 (16.1) 103.8 (16.3) 96.9 (19.6) 99.8 (15.2) 94.1 (12.5)
* Smokers include both current and ex-smokers.
P<0.05. Cr6+, Cr3+, and chromite groups versus the control group (differences in 1993 not analysed).

Table 2. Lung function measurements as percentage of predicted values (non-smokers)
Cr6+ group Cr3+ group Chromite group Control group
Lung 1993 1998 1993 1998 1993 1998 1993 1998
function (n=41) (n=41) (n=21) (n=21) (n=5) (n=5) (n=27) (n=27)
variable Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
FVC 96.4 (11.1) 94.2 (12.0) 93.4 (9.1) 93.6 (11.0) 96.1 (11.1) 97.0 (12.3) 93.4 (9.7) 92.4 (8.5)
FEV1 95.5 (11.4) 91.9 (11.3) 92.9 (11.2) 91.2 (12.9) 94.2 (10.8) 94.3 (13.2) 94.7 (11.6) 92.3 (10.5)
FEV% 99.8 (6.6) 97.9 (7.2) 99.1 (6.7) 97.2 (7.4) 97.7 (6.6) 97.4 (8.4) 101.5 (5.8) 99.8 (5.8)
TLCO 104.8 (11.8) 112.1 (13.9) 107.8 (15.8) 115.5 (16.9) 105.6 (5.9) 109.7 (4.8) 106.6 (14.7) 112.1 (11.7)
TLCOHb 104.1 (11.9) 109.2 (13.9) 107.8 (14.7) 110.6 (19.4) 105.9 (5.3) 106.1 (3.4) 106.3 (13.9) 107.4 (13.1)
TLCO/VA 108.6 (16.7) 109.9 (14.4) 113.2 (17.3) 112.0 (15.8) 111.4 (21.3) 104.0 (12.7) 111.5 (18.2) 110.9 (13.9)
TLCO/VAHb 108.0 (16.7) 107.2 (13.4) 113.3 (15.9) 107.1 (17.2) 111.4 (19.4) 101.0 (13.5) 111.4 (18.1) 106.0 (13.8)

Discussion on the Practical Value of Various Examination Methods

Exposure assessment both qualitatively and quantitatively is essential in the health surveillance of workers in metallurgical industry. Radiological examinations seem to give minimal information, especially on early stages of adverse health effects. At low levels of exposure biological monitoring and measurement of diffusing capacity give fairly little additional information. Spirometry can be recommended as non-harmful and giving information also on non-occupational diseases.

Summary and Conclusions

The observed levels of chromium in the urine and blood were, on average, higher than the levels among persons with no occupational exposure to chromium. None of the specimens showed the urinary chromium concentration to exceed the national Finnish action limit, and no correlation was observed between the chromium concentrations in the workplace air and in urine. No significant differences were found in the blood chromium contents in the specimens collected before or after the workweek.

The RMF in the lungs was slightly elevated among the workers in the ferrochromium smelter and the steel melting shop. Workers at the mine, in the sintering plant and in the cold rolling mill exhibited RMFs comparable with those of the controls.

There were no significant differences between the exposure groups and the controls regarding previous nasal diseases and nasal symptoms. None of the subjects had chronic ulceration, septal perforation or a nasal tumour.
No dysplasia or malignancy was observed cytologically. No statistically significant difference in the mean frequency of nasal cells with micronuclei (formed by chromosome breakage or mis-segregation) was observed between the exposed groups and the control group.

No significant differences in the frequency of the symptoms were found between the exposed and control groups. Age and smoking significantly explained the occurrence of most of the respiratory symptoms.

In 1998 no adverse effects (i.e., increase in symptom prevalence, deterioration of lung function or progression of radiographic lung findings) were observed in the group exposed to Cr6+, either in comparison with the control group in the cross-sectional study or during the 5-year follow-up.

The exposure study showed that there is certainly exposure to chromium throughout the production chain, and to Cr6+ at certain stages, but the observed health effects were minimal. This finding can be explained partly by low exposure levels and partly by the low bioavailability of potentially harmful chromium species. The low bioavailability can be explained by the surface properties and chemical composition of the metal particles in the workplace air.

An average exposure time of 23 years in ferrochromium and stainless steel production and exposure to dusts containing low concentrations of Cr6+ or Cr3+ does not lead to any respiratory changes detectable by lung function tests or radiography nor to any increase in symptoms of respiratory diseases. Nor does this exposure lead to nasal changes detectable by clinical or cytological examination. No genotoxic effects attributable to occupational chromium exposure could be observed in the micronucleus analysis of exfoliated nasal cells.

The results of this research project indicate that it is technically and economically possible to achieve low exposure levels in the stainless steel production chain with no adverse health effects. This approach should be applied in the stainless steel industry in general.

Recommendations for Occupational Health Measures

The following recommendations are based on the results of the study programme used in the Finnish research project, and they focus on the health effects of dusts and fumes containing chromium and chromium compounds in the stainless steel production chain.

There are, however, several other reasons (i.e. ergonomic problems and other exposures like noise) for monitoring health aspects of the workplace and the workers.

When process conditions are stable, annual exposure assessment is recommended. Stationary samples from typical work areas are sufficient for the analysis of total dust, total chromium and Cr6+. In chromite ore mining operations the type of waste rock must be monitored with special attention to fibrous minerals.

Some examination methods prove to give very little, if any, additional information on health effects in the modern stainless steel industry with low exposure levels to chromium compounds. Therefore MPG, biological monitoring, chest X-ray examinations, measurement of diffusing capacity, and oto-rhino-laryngological examinations, including nasal cytology, are not recommended as routine methods, nor is skin testing for chromium allergy recommended or regarded as appropriate.

Although there are no specific occupational health needs based on chromium exposure, periodic health examinations are justified because of certain public and occupational health reasons, like the early detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the benefits from monitoring the work capacity of workers. Periodic health examinations are recommended to be carried out at intervals of 3 - 5 years. They should include:

- spirometry
- a survey of respiratory symptoms as part of the surveillance of health and general work capacity

The pre-employment medical examination should include:

- an adequate occupational and health history
- a physical examination with special attention to the respiratory organs and skin
- spirometry
- a chest X-ray

References

  1. Langård S, Andersen A, Gylseth B. Incidence of cancer among ferrochromium and ferrosilicon workers. Br J Ind Med 1980;37:114-120.
  2. Axelsson G, Rylander R, Schmidt A. Mortality and incidence of tumours among ferrochromium workers. Br J Ind Med 1980; 37:121-127.
  3. Foa V, Riboldi L, Patroni M, Zocchetti C, Sbrana C, Mutti A. Effects derived from long-term low-level chromium exposure in ferro-alloy metallurgy. Study of absorption and renal function in workers. Sci Total Environ 1988; 71:389-400.
  4. Koponen M, Gustafsson T, Kalliomäki P-L, Pyy L. Chromium and nickel aerosols in stainless steel manufacturing, grinding and welding. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1981; 42: 596-601.
  5. Klein F. Nickel and chromium concentrations in ambient air of workplaces in the iron and steel industry (Fr.). In: Brown SS, Sunderman FW Jr, eds. Progress in nickel toxicology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1985:195-197.
  6. Koponen M. Applications of some instrumental methods in metal aerosol characterization. (Original Reports 2/1985), Kuopio: University of Kuopio, 1985.
  7. Delpech MA, Hillairet M. Ann Hyg Publique Méd Lég 1869; 31: 5-30. Cited by Langård S, Norseth T. Chromium. In: Friberg L, Nordberg GF, Vouk V, eds. Handbook on the toxicology of metals, Vol II. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, 1986:195.
  8. Langård S, Andersen A, Gylseth B. Incidence of cancer among ferrochromium and ferrosilicon workers. Br J Ind Med 1980; 37: 114-120.
  9. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Chromium, nickel and welding. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, Vol. 49. Lyon: IARC, 1990.
  10. De Flora S. Threshold mechanisms and site specificity in chromium (VI) carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 2000; 21(4): 533-541.
  11. Lai JS, Kuo HW, Liao FC, Lien CH. Sister chromatid exchange induced by chromium compounds in human lymphocytes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1998; 71:550-553.
  12. Vaglenov A, Nosko M, Georgieva R, Carbonell E, Creus A, Marcos R. Genotoxicity and radioresistance in electroplating workers exposed to chromium. Mutat Res 1999; 446:23-24.
  13. Wu FY, Tsai FJ, Kuo HW, et al. Cytogenetic study of workers exposed to chromium compounds. Mutat Res 2000; 464:289-296.
  14. Benova D, Hadjidekova V, Hristova R, et al. Cytogenetic effects of hexavalent chromium in Bulgarian platers. Mutat Res 2002; 514:29-38.
  15. Myslak M, Kosmider K. Frequency of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) in peripheral blood lymphocytes from stainless steel welders. Med Pr 1997; 48:399-406.
  16. Werfel U, Langen V, Eickhoff I, et al. Elevated DNA single-strand breakage frequencies in lymphocytes of welders exposed to chromium and nickel. Carcinogenesis 1998; 19:413-418.
  17. Wu FY, Wu WY, Kuo HW, et al. Effect of genotoxic exposure to chromium among electroplating workers in Taiwan. Sci Total Environ 2001; 279:21-28.
  18. De Flora S. Threshold mechanisms and site specificity in chromium (VI) carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 2000; 21(4):533-541.
  19. De Flora S, Camoirano A, Bagnasco M, Bennicelli C, Corbett GE, Kerger BD. Estimates of the chromium (VI) reducing capacity in human body compartments as a mechanism for attenuating its potential toxicity and carcinogenicity. Carcinogenesis 1997:18:531-537.
  20. Huvinen M. Exposure to chromium and its long-term health effects in stainless steel production, Kuopio University Publications, 2002.


International Chromium Development Association
45 rue de Lisbonne, 75008 Paris, France.
Tel: 33 01 40 76 06 89 Fax: 33 01 40 76 06 87
© International Chromium Development Association 2004



previous - top of page